×
India vs New Zealand SRI LANKA vs INDIA Latest News Featured COC Interviews IndVsAus Domestic COC Hindi Social Scoop Gallery

COA Says They Will Not Sacrifice India's Interest in ICC

We have a mandate from the court to run the BCCI: COA

By Rashmi Nanda -


The Board of Control for Cricket in India Committee of Administrators (COA) clearly said that they will not sacrifice India's interests while dealing with the International Cricket Council.

In the meeting, COA members Ramachandra Guha, Diana Edulji and BCCI CEO Rahul Johri were also present there. After the meeting, former CAG Vinod Rai, who leads the COA, told the select media on major issues, which is facing by BCCI.

Vinod Rai told PTI, “Let us make one thing clear we will not sacrifice India's interest. We have a mandate from the court to run the BCCI. Our attempt will be to ensure BCCI does not lose financially.”

His remarks come days after the Indian cricket board sent an 11-page letter to ICC Chief Executive Dave Richardson, where  BCCI categorically rejected the proposed revenue model and constitutional reforms.

Rai further added, “On this (ICC) issue, we met Shashank Manohar. He gave us good guidance. We are also conscious of the way the smaller nations to be encouraged. We have to keep a balance and at the same time contribute for the improvement of cricket.”

Recently, Shashank Manohar resigned from the post of ICC Chairman, just eight months into the job. When asked about not having enough knowledge about the functioning of ICC, Rai said, “Well, not two or three people are the personification of all knowledge. We are privy to the recording of the last SGM and we know what was discussed there. When we met Manohar, we tried to understand the revenue model of both the sides. He gave us full details of the financial models in the ICC.”

Rai also cleared the doubt surrounding the controversial tenure section for the office bearers as an administrator can remain in his post till the cumulative period of nine years, whether in BCCI or state association. He added, “The (Supreme Court) verdict is very clear. It's 9 years only. And there is a full stop.”

There are many state associations, who do not want to implement the Lodha panel recommendations but Rai said the COA will deal with them appropriately.

He added, “Supreme Court has given us a direction. There is a verdict in place and our job is to peruse the state associations to accept the model. It will be done and the process is on.”

Rai further said, “Considerable headway has been made. A considerable amount of time has also been given. We will work out. Our job is to see cricket should go on as per schedule. The state associations have worked in a manner for 30/40 years. You don't expect them to budge overnight. So far they have not accepted it but that does not mean they will never accept it. They must understand the SC verdict.”

When asked how to achieve the 2/3 majority in state associations to accept the changes, Rai responded, “We are talking to them and will continue to talk to them. Our immediate task is to keep the game going. For that, we have worked on the conduct of the IPL 2, auction of the IPL and arrangements of the league smoothly. We are here for the last 50 days only. Only three days ago we have put on the model constitution. We want to take things in the consultation way and not in a confrontational way.”

Rai also said that they are there to convince them to accept the Lodha panel recommendations and hopes that they will agree with them. Mr Vinod Rai said, “When we took over, we did not expect some people or rather a particular group of people to be generous. There were attempts to collaborate. Our attempt will be to persuade them to accept things. The court will play an important role in it. Some defiance was tried but they failed. If it goes on, we will react.”

He concluded, “There is a plan of action in place, well defined. But that can't be discussed. Let us make it clear. These problems are solvable and will be solved to everyone's satisfaction. We are not interested in politics. But if politics is needed to be played, then we won’t be found wanting.”